29. September 2023

Ripple CTO: XRP Holdings Don’t Mean Centralization

• Ripple’s CTO David Schwartz responded to a tweet about the decentralization of XRP and Ripple’s influence on it.
• Decentralization is achieved through the use of blockchain technology, which allows for the creation and management of digital assets in a distributed and transparent manner.
• Ripple purportedly does not have the power to alter the ledger or dictate its governance and its holdings are locked in a series of escrows to prevent any one party from manipulating the price.

Ripple CTO Discusses Decentralization

Recently, David Schwartz, chief technology officer (CTO) at Ripple, sparked a debate about the decentralization of XRP and Ripple’s influence over it. In response to a user’s comment suggesting that large XRP holdings by Ripple could potentially allow it to manipulate the price, Schwartz challenged critics to explain how this could be done.

Decentralization Explained

Decentralization is key value proposition of cryptocurrencies and refers to the distribution of authority, control, and influence across a network rather than being concentrated in a single central authority. Blockchain technology facilitates this decentralization by allowing for digital assets such as XRP to be created and managed in a distributed and transparent manner on the XRP Ledger.

Ripple’s Role in XRP

Ripple is an American payment protocol company that holds a significant amount of XRP but does not have control over the ledger or its governance. To prevent any one party from flooding or manipulating the market with these holdings, they are primarily locked in escrows which are released on a monthly basis.

Argument Against Large Holdings

An argument against large XRP holdings by Ripple is that it could manipulate prices using its reserves; however, this problem is alleviated by lock mechanisms that protect both parties from damaging their own balance sheets if they act maliciously.


Overall, while there may be concerns surrounding large stakeholdings by companies such as Ripple, these issues can be mitigated through technical measures like lock mechanisms which ensure no single entity has too much power over an asset or network.